prose praise general

B E L L O W
E
L
L
O
W

Not even memeing, I would read anything written by DFW, Pynchon, Gaddis, Barth, or McElroy.

>>9609205
Same except substitute Barth and McElroy for Gass and Hawkes.

Thomas Ligotti

>>9609213
Fair enough. I'd put Gass below them, but close. Hawkes is one I haven't gotten to you, but I'm thinking about reading Second Skin within the next few weeks. Have you read any Barth? I think he's a little more clever than Gass, but they're probably at the same level when it comes to rhythm. This is all Subjective and pointless, of course

>>9609812
>>9609213
In what world is DFW's prose even remotely close to the others on these lists?

>>9609821
Sorry man, it's my opinion. It reads like the thoughts on my head sound, and I connect with it. I think he words things on clever ways that make me giggle, and I've enjoyed everything he's written. What have you read by him?

>>9609070
Raymond Chandler is probably my favorite prose stylist. Also, I love James Elroy's choppy, fast paced narrative. Hermann Broch is another whose mastery of language can seldom be touched.

>>9609830
That's fine, i've only read IJ, but i found it to be stylistically underwhelming.
Especially compared to the others on your list who are literal prose gods.

Of those I've read lately, I'm going to say Artaud, Rodolfo Wilcock, Giorgio Manganelli and Alberto Savinio.
The last two can be considered Italian high prose surrealists (I recommend Hilarotragoedia and Achille Innamorato if you know the language), Wilcock is an amazing writer of satirical vignettes - you can read one of them here
https://harpers.org/archive/2014/12/aaron-rosenblum/
taken from his most famous book, the Temple of Iconoclasts - and as for Artaud, all I can say it's that his books will be cherished by any reader of Cioran (who is, obviously, another essential prose stylist).

>>9609875
That's fair. In my opinion, he comes close, but he's definitely below them. Pynchon, Barth, McElroy/Gaddis, is the order is personally put them. I also really enjoyed Vollmann's prose, but there's a gap between them for sure.

>>9609070

Melville, Faulkner, McCarthy.

Melville, Joyce, Nabakov, and Faulkner are the big ones for me. Pynchon also has some very good passages, and so does Gass, though I haven't read that much of either of them.

>>9609201
This. So much this.

It's a crime how overlooked Bellow is here.

>>9609821
>>9609875
His (deliberate) similarities to those authors show through more clearly in his short stories, especially the ones in Brief Interviews. I wouldn't say he's quite on their level but he incorporated enough of their ideas and stylistic approaches to his writing to be readable enough.

>>9609070
The Pynch is gonna write another novel right?
Bleeding Edge was ok but we need another major work outta the guy before he shuffles off.

Virginia Woolf

Hydriotaphia, Urn Burial - Sir Thomas Browne

File: The_Notebooks_of_Malte_Laurids_Brigge.jpg (16KB, 220x337px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 220x337px

even though it's a translation, it's fucking amazing

>>9610109
it doesn't matter, when he dies they're gonna squeeze the Pynchon brand and publish everything he has, short stories and unfinished novels he probably doesn't want anyone to see

i hope he burns everything so his legacy remains intact

>>9609802
This. TCATHR may be bleak but it's a real pleasure to read.

File: image.jpg (61KB, 546x366px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 546x366px

>>9610109
>That casual Shakespeare allusion

Proust you idiots.

>>9609070
>really, really excellent

The Sea by John Banville

File: 220px-TropicOfCancer.jpg (26KB, 220x289px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 220x289px

>Henry Miller

What a cunt

But also

What a cunt

>>9610946
this

I've yet to capture the feeling of reading The Waves for the first time

>>9609070
I have ADHD so I often find I have to push myself to get into a book when I'm starting it, but Gravity's Rainbow somehow always fucking drags me into its prose. The moment I read a few lines I feel like I have to read the next few lines, and the next few lines, and the next, etc. His prose alone is enough to keep me reading and I think that's just really impressive.

>>9609070
Gaddis is astounding. I just finished chapter 2 of The Recognitions and it blew my mind with how beautiful some of the prose was.

>>9609070
Woolf
Flaubert
Hamsun
Joyce

>>9609201
>>9610032
>>9610946
Bellow has the effortless quality in his work that makes it so easy to read and enjoy, which is entirely different from Joyce and Faulkner, but I think those three are my favorite prose authors in English. Woolf is up there, but I need to read more of her.

Melville is way better than Joyce though.

File: Screenshot_2017-06-02-00-27-04.png (1MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1920px

Personal top five:

1) Marilynne Robinson

2) Faulkner

3) DeLillo

4) William Maxwell

5) Pynchon

>>9609070
Cormac, Hemingway, Steinbeck, or anyone who writes in a direct and compressed yet vivid style

>>9616083
>Hemingway
Wat

>>9616083
John Williams too

Bernhard, Sebald, Krasznahorkai

Yes, yes, I know everyone hates Updike for being trite (I do too) but holy shit, in every prose thread no one EVER says Updike (except for me) and it blows my fucking mind

Updike blows almost every other stylist out of the water at his best, and even when he's at medium

Malcolm Gladwell
Pynchon
J. Grisham
Dean Koontz
Nathaniel Hawthorne

>>9616928
Updike is a toptier stylist, anon--Nabokov without aristocratic snark. Did you enjoy Roger's Version?