>leave chomsky to me
he was paid in weed (narcotic plant in the shrub family) to participate in the storied debate with chomsky, which as we now know here on /lit/ was a total farce
>>9608702
I love that interview. It's a shame Foucault died so soon. He was a very cool, stylish, intellectual man. I love the way he talks, he's so confident and handsome.
foucault's putatively intellectual interest in power is nothing more than post-hoc window dressing for his deep sadomasochistic tendencies
someone summarize le french aids man's views for me
>>9609216
>weed (narcotic plant in the shrub family)
>>9609216
>Similarly, an offshoot discipline, cultural studies, is pervaded by neo-Romantics. For example, after his televised debate with Noam Chomsky in 1971, Michel Foucault was partially paid in hashish. For weeks afterward, his friends in Paris referred to it as the "Chomsky hash."
Le french degenerate used AIDS. It's super effective.
>>9609234
RELAX DON'T DO IT
WHEN YOU WANNA SUBDUE IT
>>9609234
They're the same as chomskys except Foucault is a pessimist
Enemy of the proletariat.
And a faggot too,
>>9609279
Ok, now tell me what you think about Foucault
>>9609279
>tankies
>>9608702
it was this """"Debate"""" that opened my eyes to how much of a hack fraud chomsky was and how corrupt the analytics are in general. Sad!
>>9609279
Actually this.
It's good to see there're still comrades.
>>9609279
Isn't that exactly the opposite of what he is though? Doesn't everything he says imply he's the enemy of the bourgeoisie?
>>9609216
>it's true
*blocks your path and tells you to sort yourself out *
Wat do
>>9609588
get that SHIT out of this thread