Illusion of Fairness

File: 1490387370689.jpg (380KB, 1024x939px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 1024x939px

We want to believe that there is a certain prospect in thereby there is worth in it. This is like the concept of Existentialism or rather Absurdism in Camus’ view. That since everything is ephemeral and one does not possess of afterlife (accord to him), that it is a waste of effort to simply do anything. We, humans, stand in the perspective unlike the following apropos. Thus, we believe in the concept of Formalism to the periphery of jurisprudence. That now we should look towards Ascriptivism, for which one is liable for a conduct solely because they committed it and under societal consensus it is seen as fallacious and erroneous. This is found under the study of Methodological Behaviorism, this depicts how one’s internal state depends on their status and identity in society, we choose to be unique, and take the steps to it, much like it is auspicious to us in the future. We fight for what we belief, and thus become an authentic individual filled with ingenuity. Those individuals is what we laud, and the followers come are those less reputable and not the aboriginal ones. This is the theory that Kierkegaard proposed, how one in terms of their psychological and theological stance can act differently and uniquely, sui generis. The antecedent and the latter of working towards your goal, enduring all predicaments and becoming a genuine and authentic individual for which succumbs to international attention. This is what is surmounted to, a body of social justice all initiated by the pyramid conceived and postulated by Kierkegaard, Kierkegaardism.