Is there any philosopher who has seen further than picrelated?

File: adorno.jpg (54KB, 627x510px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 627x510px

The depression of 1920 already proved right-wingers economists wrong. There's a reason why we don't take austrian economics seriously here.

>>9541560
He's the man who instantly comes to mind when I read or hear the word 'hack'.

>>9541574
was Hayek responsible in any way for the economic policies leading to 29?
Didn't think so

>>9541574
But let me guess, we continue to take socialist '''economics''' seriously here.

:^) checkmate atheists

>>9541597
>le evils socialists don't understand BASIC economics
back to /pol/, we read books here

What the fuck is it with this influx of Austrian economy tards?

bunch of bullshitters building their free market castles in the sky.

>>9541627
>waah muh circlejerk has been tainted!

The most underrated thinker in human history, the pure genius of the Use of Knowledge in Society & his following works are so staggering they'll be talked about in 100 years if we make it that far.

The understanding of this organism, infinitely incalculable is both the simplest yet most profound economic truth ever spoken.

I like the way he wrote, almost as if playing with the ideas in his had even as he wrote them down in draft form, how he almost goes on an intellectual journey then and there constantly evolving rather than sprinting in with rock solid priori conclusion. The polar opposite of Marx that started with an idea and tried to build a body of science to provde it, Hayek exhaustingly went through the observation of human behavior to fine that shinning god particle at the heart of it all.

TL:DR - Read his fucking books you lazy bastards.

>>9541624
>>9541627
Ever read the works of your enemies you overly bias twats? Or is the search for truth too scary for your ego to take?

>>9541636
It's not a matter of circlejerk. Right-wingers like you always try to turn every single thread into a silly us vs them battle. It's anti-intellectualism at its purest form. Just look at this thread.

>>9541641
>The polar opposite of Marx that started with an idea and tried to build a body of science to provde it

That isn't what Marx did you hack.

>>9541664
Ah bullshit of course he did, he's got to be the most assumptive intellectual "titan" in literary history. It reeks in his writting. Despite how rigorous he was there's no air of intellectual curiosity to find the truth but rather a great work to try and prove his truth.

>>9541650
Truth doesn't exist.

>>9541686
> .t Max Stirner
Truth is a spook amirite?