What did google mean by this?

Why is Richard Spencer on there?

>>9522639
No idea. What happens when you search it?

>white

I see what they're doing

>>9522619
Try searching for 'famous authors'. That'll calm your racial hated and 'redpilledness'

>It's real
Holy shit really made me thunk

>>9522676
I get the same results. I doubt this is intentional though, Google's algorithm is just stupid sometimes

I guess google is confused because any time people use the words "white male authors" they are doing so in the context of trying to promote authors who don't fit into that category.

>>9522737
oh wow u cracked the code man xD

>>9522697

No I like being mad!

>>9522730
googe white anything. white inventors, white mathematicians, etc.

>>9522619
maybe it gives you people who have written about 'whiteness'

File: white progressives.jpg (412KB, 599x799px) Image search: [Google]

412KB, 599x799px

>>9522697
>That'll calm your racial hated
Extremely unlikely. I have a moral responsibility to exterminate white people from the face of the planet

>>9522730
(((I doubt this is intentional though)))

>>9523878
holy redpill xDD

File: trtrtrt.png (2MB, 1882x714px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1882x714px

hmm

File: Skjermbilde.png (1MB, 1116x624px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1116x624px

>>9523907
Ok seriously, how the fuck do you explain this?

File: Screenshot_2017-05-18_21-58-46.png (317KB, 1258x788px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 1258x788px

what went wrong?

>>9523884
>t. /r/plebbit

>>9523970
Maybe you should head back
Last I looked your board needed help btfo-ing the Zionist DNC

>>9522619
Google's search algorithm reads "white" as a color, not an ethnicity

they all write about white males

>>9524602
This is probably pretty close desu - from the screencaps it looks like each is linked to an article about "are we reading too many white male authors" or similar

>>9523939
Try "couple" vs "black couple"

>>9522619
>three black authors who write about race and Richard Spencer
I honestly lost my shit this is hilarious.

It's because race is more likely to be mentioned in articles about black authors and someone like Richard Spenser. Like, a journalist is more likely to bring up "white male" authors with Paul Beatty than with Stephen King. Spenser's a neo-nazi so whiteness is going to be mentioned in conjunction with him a lot etc

>>9522619
>american """"white""""

I wish there was somewhere to discuss books about the internet without frogpsters sperging out about how their entire identities are in jeopardy because they ask loaded questions and are disappointed with the fucking google results

>>9525388
Quiet, shitskin.

>>9525388
>white authors
>loaded question
check out r/books faggot

>>9523970
Back to /r/the_donald cuck

File: Untitled.jpg (148KB, 1867x394px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1867x394px

>>9523189
That's because people looking for such typically type in "authors that arent white males" and the algorithm just looks for closest connections.

>>9523351
imagine how many stains are on that outfit now

>>9522619

you need to be more specific

https://www.google.com/#q=best+american+authors
https://www.google.com/#q=best+british+authors
https://www.google.com/#q=best+african+american+authors
https://www.google.com/#q=best+african+authors

File: Capture.png (383KB, 911x891px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 911x891px

>>9523947
The first white male authors search isn't an image search, yours is. On mine it shows both as it likes to show me image results further down the page.

File: images.duckduckgo.com.jpg (9KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 480x360px

>>9526644
>No DFW

>>9522730
>>9523878
this
ok so don't blame the jews if you take that shit too literally, but this isn't just a shit algorithm they have proven many times that they have an agenda.

google is shit

>>9526644
>Stephen King
>JRR Tolkien
uhh