>we're condemned to be free wew lad

File: cagedwill.jpg (49KB, 600x399px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 600x399px

>implying free will exist

>>9511785

> implying that the reality from which you derive the idea that free will doesn't exist exists

>>9511826
>Implying it doesn't

>>9511875

> implying that I'm implying that it doesn't

>>9511774
False. Consider the crushing nature of most employment. They control how you live, how you dress, with whom you speak, how you talk, etc. Consider how the world has changed since Sartre's death.

What would a stalin loving faggot know about freedom?

No one in this thread has read Sartre.

>>9511911
quit

File: sartre.png (508KB, 994x583px) Image search: [Google]

508KB, 994x583px

>we're condemned to spend the entire occupation of France by Germany refusing to take a strong position in favour of the Resistence and even mildly collaboration, only to join the communist armies after Liberation and acting as a judge condemning to death penalty people executed only for their class and not because of any collaboration
>we're condemned to shill for Stalin's regime, and then, after the Secret Speech and Khruschev denunciation of Stalin's, shift your support to Mao because there is nothing better than being a pro-communist intellectual in Paris
>we're condemned to conspire with our feminist wives to groom and rape her teenage students because you're too ugly to get pussy otherwise

There is not a single human being I hate more than Jean-Paul Sartre. He was probably the worst person who has ever lived, by any objective standard.

>>9512201
Go to bed, Mainländer

>>9512208
please tell me that's all fake.

>>9512231
Sartre has always been the near axiomatic definition of "Champagne Socialist", "Caviar Communist", and "Scum".

>>9512231

It's not. He even suggested suppressing information about Communist purges the world over so as not to 'discourage the proletariat'. He is literally the definition of a guy who advocates for something that he has no personal experience with or understanding of whatsoever.

sartre is p insufferable

>>9511905
>implying you arent

>>9512231
https://aeon.co/ideas/how-camus-and-sartre-split-up-over-the-question-of-how-to-be-free

Sartre legitimately seemed to love and fantasize about violence, he was a privileged edgelord. He didn't abandon this after Stalin died either, read his introduction to Fanon's Wretched of the Earth, it's embarrassingly nauseous.

>Freedom is another word for nothing left to lose
- Leodor Tolstoyevsky

>>9511774
feeling pretty retarded considering I used to think this guy was the absolute shit; more I delved into his biography, the more i learned how hypocritical he was. To anyone thinking we should judge the work and not the author, even his work feels fraudulent now

at least he got me more interested in philosophy

>>9512188
Eh, read a few of his novels and plays, not the other stuff.