I read this does that mean I'm gay now

>>9510593
It's a good book..
But I give up.
Punch line?

>now

>>9510880
Wow. After I read it I just went on to something else without the feel that my sexuality had been alerted in the slightest. But perhaps I read it wrong. Or poorly. Or something.

>>9510593
Why would it mean you're gay?

>>9511464
What if it turned me gay after reading it

>>9511677
Then it wd have magic, transformative powers-- a literary secret!
Wd (you) care to share your Edithic experience with two or three of /lit/'s more sensitive (((souls)))?

>>9511677
Why would it turn you gay after reading it?

>>9511882
haha have you read Edith Wharton?

>>9511899
Yes. Why would you think it has the possibility to turn you gay?

>>9512529
From reading it. It might have turned me gay

>>9512782
youre not gay, anon. merely gender-confused. (you) a millennial?

>>9511899
>>9512782

>reading females and gays makes you gay too

protip: they are only books. the issue might be with you, friend.

>>9513792
I'm feeling rather queer after reading this post. Is it possible it turned me gay?

>>9513792
But it's Wharton... She might have turned me gay while I was reading it

>>9510593

>be not gay
>everyone thinks you're gay
>despite not being gay people have fits of rage over the thought that you are gay
>be amused at people and how they act when they think something
>be amused at how easy people are to manipulate
>everybody knows deep down that you are not, infact, gay

What a masterpiece this Edith gal wrote.

>>9511766
>sexuality is set in stone

>>9512529
Because I started dreaming about dicks right after I read it.

>>9514175
Mike Hammer? Sam Spade?

>>9514039
What

>>9514039
>gal
sly move, anon.

>>9510593
One of the best books I've ever read desu, Wharton and James don't get nearly enough attention on 4chan. Is it because they're both inherently un-memey?

File: hj.jpg (23KB, 289x475px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 289x475px

>>9510593
I read this does that meme I slobber the white stuff now

>>9516611
Probably

>>9516611
>penguin classics
for sure