Is escapism wrong?

>>9508909
escapism is too poorly defined to be anything.

>>9508912
stupid reply.

>>9508909
wrong? for it to be wrong then something has to be right. and i cant even figure out whats left, let alone right - well, except for when whats left on my plate is broccoli. damn i hate broccoli.

>>9508969
Go back

all conversation, celebrity gossip, sports, movies, music, etc. revolves around escapism. people are selective with how they apply the escapist label, usually only applying it to things they don't like [video games, for example]. life itself, devoid of escapism, is nothing but dead air.

File: pepe wilhelm.jpg (51KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 499x499px

try apollonian and dionysian escapism, they are both good coping mechanisms

>>9508969
Cringe

File: real fucking spooky around here.gif (10KB, 279x305px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 279x305px

>wrong

If your definition of escapism is broad enough then everything is escapism - life is a distraction from death.

Some use it to insult other's interests.

What would life be without escapism?

>>9508909
Escape implies captivity. Unless captivity overstates 'responsibilities,' Escapism is always right.

>>9509586
Best answer.

>>9508969
>calling another post a stupid reply while replying with the embodiment of Reddit-esque aids

it is an inevitability. escapism imposes stagnation, and potentially - if used in excess - regression

when one utilises escapism too much one is a customer to that activity. when one listens to within one is without bounds

>>9508969
John Green?