Is the Genealogy of Morals a justification for anarcho-capitalism?
I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY I HAVE TO SUFFER ALL THESE WORTHLESS FUCKING THREADS
WHY ARE YOU DOING THIS TO ME? WHY WOULD I HAVE TO READ A THREAD LIKE THIS? WHAT THE FUCK DID I DO TO DESERVE THIS
>>9500452
fuck off /pol/
>>9500460
You're here.
No.
>>9500452
No, not at all. It is an explanation of the origin of ideologies, not an ideology in itself.
Anarcho-capitalism has a very obvious genealogy in the American frontier, and will die out when the US becomes more evenly populated, and the historically bizarre bonanza that let dry goods dealers and ranchers believe they were noble and free finally dries up.
When the frontier runs out, when the family farm bumps up against another farm and every inch is argued over, when the resources are tapped, when houses press closely against each other and even share walls, there won't be much talk of anarcho-capitalism.
The US will resemble China: a billion-strong superpower with a hierarchical and cooperative ethos.
>>9500584
How is the master and slave morality not a perfect metaphor for the anarcho-capitalist mindset?
>>9500634
Because the anarcho in anarcho capitalist indicates an unwillingness to rule, and the capitalist in anarcho capitalist indicates a desire to play by the rules and be left unmolested.
Essentially, it's the ideology of peasants who find themselves in an empty and rich landscape without supervision for the first time.
Master ideology develops when man rules man and does not need to offer strong punishments or big rewards to make the slave abase himself. You see it mainly in feudal or plantation economies, and very often in colonial contexts.
>>9500452
Of course not. Have you read the actual book? It literally says that the strong ones are the 'veridic' ones, and that they don't stick to materialistic values.
How is the accumulation of capital going to fit anywhere in the picture?
no you fucking asshat Richard cranium
Fuck off faggot