Are new schools of philosophy possible?

You're a moron.

Just urself

>>9496802
Is this a serious fucking question?

>>9496802
This may be a genuine question but it also serves as great bait. It's bound to offend the wannabe philosophers on here who think they're going to add to philosophy. That's why people are getting mad. Poor babies.

>>9496823
>>9496802
You're both retards

>>9496826
Ahaha you're so mad. You're devoting your life to a dead end. I'd be mad too if I were that retarded

Important question, many in academic philosophy are convinced that everything has alrady been done. But this thread has already gone to shit.

>>9496914
Just take a look at the OP's picture. This thread was unsavable vulgar waste from the start.

File: hqdefault.jpg (10KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 480x360px

>>9496973
Damn, that's a good picture!

philosophy departments in angloland are getting more and more isolated so its the opposite lmao

http://web.stanford.edu/dept/news/news/1999/february3/rorty23.html

Read someone outside the canon, philosophy is vast.

>>9496802
That would be a shit idea because 99% of philosophy is trash.

>>9497116
should I kms for knowing this reference and hearing danny's dumbass voice in my head?

>>9496802
All philosophies are the same, "new" philosophies are just remolded thoughts that relate to the present