oh my, why wasn't I warned?

>>9493658
You were warned:
>The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

>>9493658

What is the internet doing to our brains?

is this actually a good book? i am interested in sopmething on the subject but by the cover and title this looks like some pop science pseudoluddite pleb bait

>>9493658
>implying you would've changed your behavior
Billions of dollars and legions of STEMfags are put to work to further your internet addiction desu.

>>9493849
it's a little all over the place but it was a good read imo

he cites neuroscience studies a lot so it isn't like he's pulling information out of his ass.

>>9493849
>>9493863

The basic premise of the book is that using the internet a lot fucks with our attention spans, especially if you were raised by it. It's a fundamentally different form of interaction than, say, reading a book. I don't remember the book saying anything about us never using the internet again or something like that, but there is certainly a lament for people's lost ability to concentrate.

>>9493863
>neurosciences
so is, indeed popsci trashw

>>9493884
>so is, indeed popsci trashw
Case in point: what the Internet is doing to our brains.

File: oh snap.jpg (90KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 640x640px

>>9493892
>>9493892
>>9493892

>>9493876
This seems fairly obvious, even based on empirical self-observation, I get the book has its place as it gathers all the evidence, but why would a layman read it if this is the general point?

bantz

>>9493937
to further your understanding of the matter and read of examples of tests done, etc

>>9493667
thats only /b/