form or content? >inb4 both xD don't be a sissy smart ass

content. also get fucked faggot ur snek court has no legal grounds

>>9490898
lol

>>9490602
Good books require at minimum good form, and become great books with great content. A book with good content and poor form is a poor book.

>>9490907
lol

>>9490602
>not forms of content and forms of expression
lel pleb can't even into assemblage theory

>>9490602
Neither.

Form is the content. McLuhan motherfuckers.

>>9492335
>Form is the content.
wrong

Unironically both. Too bad not many writers, even great ones, are actually capable of this

File: 1494191041808.jpg (65KB, 666x400px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 666x400px

Is "Purple Prose" a good example of form?

>>9490602

>form or content?

shirt or pants?

I would read a great book with boring af, meaningless content if the form was good enough. Form can be enjoyed even without good content.

Content is always vastly negatively impacted when expressed with poor form, to the point it can be unreadable. Sometimes reading poor-form content is necessary, but it is never enjoyable.