>extremely well read and studied philosophy for most of his life
>husserl's assistant
>decided to read nietzsche's complete works in order to describe his philosophy
>concluded that there's no such thing as a nietzsche's philosophy, because nietzsche's claims are so emotional to the point that they don't even connect logically to each other
Why don't you simply accept that Nietzsche is for pseuds, /lit/? Do you really think you understand his books more than based Fink? Why someone would bother to read a philosopher without a philosophy?
w-why don't y-you read him p-pleb! y+you didn't get it!!!
I accepted it long ago and never looked back.
Reminder that neechee is chicken soup for the pseud
That was a very empassioned appeal, OP. Based in emotion, I would say.
Nietzsche doesn't give a fuck about having a systematic thought, you totally missed the point, pleb
>>9486623
>the point is being shit so you can't say it's shit!
>Not reading Nietzsche as a moralist
>>9486549
You spelled his name wrong, pinhead.
>can't German