aphoristic "philosophers" are the weakest race

>>9483119

In order for this sentiment to carry weight, it would have to be true that such types are always trying to win [internet] arguments, rather than simply recording their views, which do entail a meaninglessness.

Even this rebuttal has been too much; in the end, it's all the same of course.

>>9483151
No really it's absolutely frustrating to read something where the very point is that none of the ideas get fleshed out. Ideas need to stretch their legs, not be consumed like a clump of tiny fish eggs. It's an absolute cop out imo.

File: I am now.jpg (2MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x1936px

>>9483119

As if Arthur were merely aphoristic.

>>9483242
ah a fellow intellectual!

>>9483242
Sweet jaysis

Y'all take german metaphysics this serious

>>9483171
Lichtenburg, Nietzsche, Adorno (in the Minima): Caviar.

Nice aphorism

>>9483171
Aphorisms are great, usually their point is that the reader himself is supposed to think about it. And a point made in an aphorism isnt always needed to be fleshed out for 50 pages; that would probably be 50 pages of air, basically repeating the same thing over and over

>>9484454

There's a thread like two before yours with the same picture, quote, and name


....fucking idiot.....