Who's the Right-wing equivalent of Chomsky?
Hard-mode: If there's no clear match, find the closest approximate.
>>9471398
in what sense? right-wing critic of american foreign policy? right-wing public intellectual? right-wing linguist?
henry kissinger, probably
Ayn Rand
>Pseud
>Wrote a bunch of shit not worth reading
>Shit ideology
>Only mentioned by brainlets
>>9471401
Schmitt advocated for full power of the state. Right wing chompsky is unironically Molenyeux, just slightly more irritating
>>9471401
I think people see Schmitt's work as being more opposed (though obviously not written with him in mind) to Rawlsian style liberalism.
Hobbes
Jonathan Bowden.
>>9471414
totalitarianism is "right wing", doesn't matter if it's fascism or stalinism or anywhere inbetween since it's fundamentally opposed to freedom
"left wing" ideology is always premised on some notion of freedom [positive or negative]
>>9471414
>just slightly more irritating
More irritating than Molyneux? Impossible.
>>9471618
Being this deluded
>>9471618
You've got it completely backwards.
>>9471618
You are either trolling or taking deeply biased definitions of these concepts at face value.
>>9471398
Your use of "hard-mode" us the direct contrary of what hard-mode is.
Go hang yourself on the nearest bridge near you
>>9471898
Except he doesn't. Try actually reading about political science m8
>>9471618
/pol/ detected
>right wing equivalent of a pseudo intellectual demagogue whose intellectual relevance has long since faded but whose fanboys incessantly spam his name in an attempt to be seen as intellectual and edgy
probably sam hyde or milo desu not even joking
>>9471618
>This is the average /pol/ack