Tell me about Stirner, are his works worth getting into?

Not really

>>9469010
Check the archives.

>>9469016
Care to elaborate?

>>9469024
fuck off

>>9469010
Yes, and it's pretty short.
>>9469016
>>9469026
pleb

Absolutely. If you know about the memes and have read wikipedia, read Stirner's Critics first, as that clear up most misunderstandings.

File: 814206047_2019824.gif (150KB, 245x320px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 245x320px

>>9469010
They are, but you should really take time in consuming them. They aren't very long, collectively they are probably less than 1000 pages.

His ideas are presented in a fashion that leaves them very much to interpretation, no doubt on purpose, and most people try to read them and integrate them into their beliefs. It's best to start with a "clean slate" ideologically before reading his main work, and to really try and get a feel for it outside of something supplemental to your beliefs, it creates a pretty profound mindset imo.

File: 18157964_10210481236880836_5852369463118515646_n.jpg (22KB, 480x318px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 480x318px

>>9469010
Yes.

T. now, voluntary egoist

>>9469010
If you have to ask you will never rid yourself of spooks.

>>9469010
Why does he wear the glasses?

>>9469010
You kind of missed the boat, Stirner posting has pretty much died

The Ego and His Own is really his only "work."

Memes aside, he had some interesting ideas and is interesting to study but shouldn't be taken too seriously. There's a reason he's not really covered in philosophy or political theory courses. He's like a less stupid Ayn Rand.

>>9471010
>There's a reason he's not really covered in philosophy or political theory courses.
That's because he triggers marxists and collectivists of all sorts, and those are prevalent in political philosophy.
Overall I agree, he's not too deep but definitely worth reading.