/lit/ Philosophy guide

>>9468037
Basically all 20th century philosophy that isn't Husserl and Heidegger or Marxism simply isn't featured.

>>9468037
>People spend 40 years exclusively reading and learning about one Philosopher
>/lit/ thinks the simple process of skimming several hundred is going to accomplish anything

File: 1483009944238.jpg (2MB, 900x6474px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 900x6474px

Use this.

>>9468074
>>9468267

Thanks anons

>>9468093
>Ppl spend 40 years practicing tennis, you really think they know how to play another sport

Since when did synergy become a lie. When did it become possible to do things in isolation

>>9468074
Uh yeah it is, go to the bottom? It links to diff doc

>>9468288
When Hegel became popular (again).

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/mobilebasic?pli=1
At bottom

>>9468267
Absolutely brain dead retarded descriptions. Probably made by an anglo autist.

>>9468293
Hegel was a Continental philosopher...

>>9468304
Anon... That's was clearly a reference to Zizek, who tries to tie literally everything about to Hegel.

>>9468307
that's the problem with being a hegel scholar, when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail

>>9468307
When did zizek say that?
>>9468320
I don't understand the reference, I'm not a hegelian scholar. Just know the basics of philosophy

>>9468320
Zizek is of course a Hegelian, but hardly a Hegel scholar. Hegel scholars, much like Heidegger scholars, are people that spent literally all of their just trying to explain what the fuck these guys were even saying.

>>9468292
I'm talking about those different docs

>>9468267
This doesn't have Karl Popper on it... how the fuck can you recommend this garbage?

>>9468267
Not that great of a list desu.