What are your thoughts on David Berlinski and his books?

>>9453135
>Berlinski is a secular Jew
We are redpilled here, kid. We're against atheists and semites. Time you realized your time is over

>>9453150
if memory serves me right he declared himself agnostic, so he ain't atheistic

>>9453157
>Berlinski says he is skeptical of evolution for a number of reasons, including the appearance "at once" of an astonishing number of novel biological structures in the Cambrian explosion, the lack of major transitional fossils transitional sequences, the lack of recent significant evolution in sharks, the evolution of the eye, and the failure of evolutionary biology to explain various phenomena ranging from the sexual cannibalism of redback spiders to why women are not born with a tail.[11] The article was described by historian of science Ronald L. Numbers as "a version of ID theory."
Atheists BTFO

>>9453170
he's pretty good though, raises valid points
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6ElA0--JNg

>>9453176
that's it, I'm a God missile now

Next time, please try to present an argument or something in the OP instead of an inane 'tell me what to think /lit/!'

>>9453186
Can you explain how the vast majority of mutations are deleterious, if they are to be the engines of evolution? Since they're the source of genetic diversity according to the current darwinian theory.

We have life-like system today, such as computer code. So why can't we put a darwinian algorithm in them and see something with the complexity of life developing? You can put equations from the theory of relativity and see the results, so where are the demonstrations of darwinian theory?

If we take a copy of Windows and make random changes, it will experience catastrophic failure at one point, why isn't this happening with living systems?


Darwinian theory says whales have common ancestry with cows, they're considered part of the ungulates, so they came from land. How many changes are required for a land based animal to be able to live fully in the ocean, and what should be expect of the fossil record based on that estimate?


he didn't mention deities at any point, he's just criticizing the darwinian theory.