To read or not to read?

if you a) are interested in Evola, and/or b) are interested in magic, then yes.
accessorily, if you are interested in symbolic thought, then read it too.

>>9451359
>magic
>"practical"
>Evola

Yeah sure why not, but don't expect to get anything worthwhile out of it. Evola was a crazy person with some intriguing ideas about the relationship between proto-Indian mythic cycles and trends in modern society, but only his stuff on culture is worth reading just to get an unusual point of view, and even that gets bogged down with all kinds of massive leaps of logic. Every time he goes off about sex magic or whatever it's just a load of trash though and you'd be no better or worse off than picking up some random new age pamphlet about tantric yoga crystals or whatever the fuck

>>9451359
it's a very interesting read, but it isn't an "introduction" at all

>>9451386
in order to practice sex magic, you need to have sex , incel anon.

>>9451390
What would be a good introduction

>>9451477
Franz Bardon.
But yeah, Evola, with a bit of supplementary reading, yes. if magic is only peripheral to your interests as a whole.