Just purchased pic related in that edition, what am I in for?
Also, post other editions of books which are small and dense, why are they so A E S T H E T I C?
>>9423535
Tiny font. You'll also have to wrestle with the pages in the middle to see the last few letters on the left page of a spread and the first few on the right. It's not a particularly good edition.
>>9423535
>What am I in for?
A shitty book. Just read the first 1/4th of it and then sparknotes or something for the rest.
I have this version. The print is so fucking small
Is this of any real merit or is it purely masturbatory /pol/ tier nonsense?
>>9425367
It's okay, but I enjoyed The Fountainhead much more. Start with that and then move on to this one I suppose.
>>9425367
Most of what people identify as /pol/ isn't libertarian in any real sense. They think all real free market libertarians are cucks. I don't get why people conflate the two or why anarcho-capitalist think tanks like the Mises Institute get called "neo-Nazis" and lumped in with an alt-right that is largely socialist or third way.
The book is fine. Yeah, it's not some literary masterpiece, but the amount of criticism it gets is not deserved. People are more than willing to engage shitty writing for the ideas or to forgive flaws in left-leaning material.
The vitriol that Atlas Shrugged and Ayn Rand gets is also hilarious considering the praise that shitty writers like Rupi Kaur get.
>>9425385
>third way
you mean third position
third way is for cucks
>>9423535
I really like Atlas Shrugged but I love The Fountainhead. I read The Fountainhead and Dune at least once a year and have been doing so for over a decade....over two decades for Dune.
>>9425385
> The book is fine. Yeah, it's not some literary masterpiece
I might be willing to give it a go just for shits and giggles if it wasn't a behemoth of a book. I don't have any interest in reading anything this long that isn't a masterpiece.