Guilty pleasures

>>9421778
isn't this thread impossible to make since the book is now something you've admitted to liking? then it doesn't even apply to the list anymore.

>>9421789
master of logic right here.

>>9421778
Unironically, Neil Gaiman (Neverwhere, American Gods, Ocean at the end of the Lane, Fragile Things, etc).

Maybe the Dark Materials trilogy too but that's more acceptable here since Philip Pullman isn't an SJW.

I also love everything Cormac McCarthy that I have read so far and I know plenty of people on /lit/ do too but there's a vocal group that keeps spouting "corncobber tortilla YeCarthy spat and rode on" as if that's his complete bibliography. These niggas need to actually read one of his books sometime.

Stephen King movie adaptations are better than the books.

>>9421845
>hasn't read IT

Historic fantasy
Like Cornewell, Conn Iggulden etc

>>9421789
do i hear Russell's paradox?

A few Dean Koontz books (Lightning, Watchers, Odd Thomas)

File: 91JYY6nSK8L.jpg (552KB, 1650x2475px) Image search: [Google]

552KB, 1650x2475px

James Bond Series

File: Michael Crichton - Fiction.png (635KB, 1123x794px) Image search: [Google]

635KB, 1123x794px

>>9421778
Michael Crichton

I used to read lots of genre fiction, not so much lately, but I guess I technically still like them.
>Harry Potter
>Ender's game and a bunch of its sequels
>Michael Crichton
>His Dark Materials

Oh, but actually I read some David Baldacci books and looking back they were absolute garbage. Even the plots made no sense and that's the one thing genre fiction is supposed to be good at.