Translation thread

Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
Translation thread 2017-04-21 08:48:13 Post No. 9410576
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 1491093820155.png (3MB, 2000x2100px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2000x2100px

Translation thread Anonymous 2017-04-21 08:48:13 Post No. 9410576 [Report]

I've been referring to this chart and apparently the P&V translations of Dostoevsky is shit. Is this a good translation for C & P?
https://www.amazon.com/Crime-Punishment-Oxford-Worlds-Classics/dp/0199536368

Anonymous 2017-04-21 08:52:13 Post No.9410588
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-04-21 08:52:13 Post No.9410588 [Report]

>>9410576
this chart is garbage, the guy who made it read noen of those books and just namedropped some shit he saw on /lit/ as he admitted in the thread

Anonymous 2017-04-21 08:53:45 Post No.9410594
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-04-21 08:53:45 Post No.9410594 [Report]

>>9410576

They aren't shit. That's just a reaction to all the marketing hype they got. There are definitely better ones though. Don't know about that one, but OWC tend to have reliable translations. I like revised Garnett and have always found her style to be very appropriate.

Anonymous 2017-04-21 08:55:25 Post No.9410602
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-04-21 08:55:25 Post No.9410602 [Report]

Russkie fags:
1. Is Garnett acceptable?
2. Tell me about Matlaw. I have his volume of Chekov's short stories.

Anonymous 2017-04-21 09:22:08 Post No.9410684
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-04-21 09:22:08 Post No.9410684 [Report]

>>9410594
Thanks for some actual info. I'll look into Garnett.

Anonymous 2017-04-22 12:57:18 Post No.9411460
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-04-22 12:57:18 Post No.9411460 [Report]

>>9410602
Not Russ but I remember seeing in the archive someone who knew Russian praising Matlaw because he captured the grit of Dosto's writing better than Garnett with his little revisions.

I'm reading his Notes from Underground

Anonymous 2017-04-22 01:00:48 Post No.9411471
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-04-22 01:00:48 Post No.9411471 [Report]

>>9410594
>>9410684
>P&V aren't that bad, but there are better ones
>like Garnett
HAHA WHAT

Anonymous 2017-04-22 04:03:13 Post No.9411998
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-04-22 04:03:13 Post No.9411998 [Report]

>>9411471
Dude, where have you been? Garnett is back in.

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/