Hi guys, what are the most valid books against neopositivism

*cough* Nietzsche.

>>9386885
I was searching for something more focused on theory of knowledge.

>>9386888
then i can't help you, I've only read Nietzsche

what exactly do you think neopositivism is?

>>9386932
Wittgenstein, Russell, carnap, quine

Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature

>>9386976
what is it that those 4 somehow share?

I assume you mean early Wittgenstein, but even so they all have a lot of differences

if you summarise let's say the 3 key statements of neopositivism so I have a better idea of what you are interested in then I'll be able to recommend some books

Husserl - Crisis of European science

>>9386979
- linguistic analysis
- verificationism
- refuse of metaphysic

>Something like that, i mean i ve studied the classics (hume, Hegel, ecc) but i wanted to know if a serious critic of neopositivism have been done in more recent time

>>9386995
Approved.
Neopositivism sounds really valid at first. But from the position of phenomenology it suddenly becomes less convincing.

>>9387069
Any other book beside Husserl?

>There is any good generic book about phenomenology? Maybe that talk of the points of view of the most important philosopher in the business?

>>9387073
Im intrested to

>>9386976
>Implying Wittgenstein (the great proponent of anti-scientism) was a positivist
>Implying Quine, the anti-empiricist naturalist philosopher was a positivist

>>9387073
Bump