Serious question: is being verbose the only way to make your prose more aesthetic?
>>9384137
Only if you're doing it deliberately and meaningfully. Verbosity for its own sake has no value, it should be instead seen as a tool you've got to elevate and make even more specific, emblematic and palpant concepts and dynamics in your texts.
But I'm pretty sure you already knew that.
word on the street is there are several disjoint aesthetics
>>9384137
No. Please refer to Flaubert
Being verbose without having a damn good reason for it is the best way to make your prose LESS aesthetic tbqhwy