He was right about everything.

>>9382700

Imperfect duties do not follow at all from the categorical imperative.

Kant used reason to discover the limits of reason which is just about the dumbest thing you could possibly do.

>>9382700
>>9382708
>>9382710
THAT'S NOT KANT!
THAT'S JACOBI!
http://www.iep.utm.edu/kantview/
http://www.iep.utm.edu/jacobi/

>>9382710
are you reasoning that 'finding the limit of reason' is outside of the reach of reason? what im saying is that youre dumb and self contradicting

>>9382809
I'm saying that reason cannot find the limits of reason without already having some prior means of doing so.

>>9382809
In case this >>9382812 wasn't clear enough for you. I'm saying that something other than reason must provide those "prior means".

>>9382807
what the fuck, better fix that shit up wikipedia

>>9382708
>>9382710
Jesus have you read Kant through the eyes of Nietzsche or what, you poor creatures

>>9382710
t. dumb burger

>>9382812

you mean like a priori synthetic propositions?

>>9382807
MASAKA

>>children on /lit/ think his main contribution is ethics
>>children can't into the 3rd critique

File: Schopenhauer.jpg (14KB, 300x358px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 300x358px

>>9382700
No.
But he was very right about some things.