why can't atheists beat this man in an argument?
Why can't you move a boulder by talking to it?
Because he died and only posers argue with dead people.
>>9370308
Can he prove God exists with demonstrable evidence?
No?
Well he loses automatically.
>>9370320
>He can't move a boulder by talking to it
Pseud
>>9370320
4When they came to the crowd, a man approached Jesus and knelt before him. 15“Lord, have mercy on my son,” he said. “He has seizures and is suffering greatly. He often falls into the fire or into the water. 16I brought him to your disciples, but they could not heal him.”
17“You unbelieving and perverse generation,” Jesus replied, “how long shall I stay with you? How long shall I put up with you? Bring the boy here to me.” 18Jesus rebuked the demon, and it came out of the boy, and he was healed at that moment.
19Then the disciples came to Jesus in private and asked, “Why couldn’t we drive it out?”
20He replied, “Because you have so little faith. Truly I tell you, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you.” [21]a
>>9370335
The bible is serious
>>9370308
the kalman cosmo argument assumes the big bang is a discrete event point in space which is a complete misunderstanding of expansionist cosmologies and spacetime physics
even if you assume god exists his argument for the correctness of the biblical interpretation is built on israeli success and he has no substantial argument for a specific christian interpretation other than "muh feels"
>>9370337
Maybe to you. I enjoy it, and thus undertake an action involving it that is inherently playful. I'll definitely admit that reading the bible is much more enjoyable than listening to WLC maunder