Find 1 (one) flaw with these books.
>>9368777
the one on the right has a creased dust jacket
I strongly suspect that nobody on /lit/ has read all three books
>>9368777
They're not of equal thickness
>>9368784
That is a shame. He's the best Anti-Marxist author.
>>9368777
They are not organized chromatically.
>>9368777
Worth reading I presume?
>>9368786
>finish years of research, spending long nights reading obscure journals that not even the most dedicated academics will read
>pour through hundreds upon hundreds of books relating to theory, philosophy, and history
>finally finish after several arduous years
>sit down to relax with a glass of whisky
>guy walks by the window and says "they ain't the right kinda thick"
>everything is shattered.
>>9369279
Reading is for homos.
>>9369303
You read his reply, ha! Checkmate.
>>9369279
If you're interested in learning about Marxism from the perspective of the historian of ideas it is great.
>>9369279
Kolakowski took British Marxists (including Hobsbawm, Stalinist apologist) to task so hard he wrote an open letter entitled "My Correct Views on Everything."
http://socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/view/5323
Kolakowski fucking rules.
>>9368784
It's a massive reference work.
Flaw : he's one of those authors that includes foreign language quotations without offering up the translation
>>9371099
>tfw monolingual
>>9371099
what language?
He's arguing against a strawman of historical materialism, just like 99% of people who ever claimed to have refuted it.
Read Castoriadis if you want a decent critique of Marxism.
>>9371148
>He's arguing against a strawman of historical materialism
explain how he's doing that with an example
>>9370843
for you
Find 1 (one) flaw with these books.
>>9371173
I don't like fairy tails
>>9368777
They have dust jackets.
>>9371173
they're heresy
>>9368777
The middle one seems to imply that there has been a golden age for Marxism.
>>9371173
While all organized religion can be reasonably concluded to be based, in substantial part, on fraud in the case of Mormonism we actually have legal record to back that claim up.
>>9373427
it just means the period when marxist thought had its most influence
>>9373547
Yes, divining was considered fraudulent by educated people in the Prophet's time (including by the judge who convicted him), but by many country folk (including Smith), it was considered a legitimate practice.
>>9373547
>I think I'm smarter than I really am
>>9373547
>While all organized religion can be reasonably concluded to be based, in substantial part, on fraud
Cite your sources
Not enough pictures
>>9375225
Good sense probably
What he said wasn't even controversial