[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

An issue with Shakespeare?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 1

File: image.jpg (93KB, 512x768px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
93KB, 512x768px
Been reading a little Shakespeare and I hate to admit but I have some difficulty figuring out what it is characters are talking about, specifically their tone or sincerity. I find something like The Faerie Queene much easier to understand.

However, it's still possible to pick out a great line or two in the text.

I was thinking, when I see a Shakespearian play performed, I understand what is happening despite this issue. However, I miss all the nuance of the wordplay and metaphors. Yet when I read it, my understanding of the actions, plot, etc. suffer yet I understand the wordplay better. Anyone else? Or is this a personal issue?
>>
>Anyone else? Or is this a personal issue?

I think this is common. Writing is 400 years old after all. It's just something you'll have to work on.
>>
>>9361190
STOP READING PLAYS
>>
>>9361190
Yes, that's common. Performances have a lot of nuances in tone of voice, gestures, mannerisms, etc. that let you understand what people mean despite not understanding the words outright. Reading allows you time to go over a line repeatedly and figure out everything you can about it, but the lack of audiovisuals means you have to be able to simulate an entire stage of actors in your mind.

I would say watch a performance first to understand the events and then read it later if you really want to scrutinize lines.
>>
>>9361190
The best way to do it is to watch the play first and then read the text.
>>
>>9361973
>>9361929
>>9361918
>Tainting your impression and interpretation of Shakespeare with some pissant director and actors ideas.
Thread posts: 6
Thread images: 1


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Posts and uploaded images are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that website. If you need information about a Poster - contact 4chan. This project is not affiliated in any way with 4chan.