Michael Crichton

sphere was the best movie of the 21st century

>>9360188
Jurassic World still is one of my favorite novels

the sequel was shit, and he obviously wrote it in a rush because they wanted a sequel for the movie

Jurassic Park is pretty decent. It's a fun read

Jurassic Park and Sphere were pretty great.
It's just that his characters lack personality at times.

>>9360188
state of fear

he shits on the environmentalist weirdo libtards

i've mostly stuck to explicitly 'literary' stuff, but lately i've had the urge to check out some pulpier material in an effort to attain a more holistic understanding of what literature can accomplish. i've been told that crichton writes top-tier pulp. would you agree, and if so what would you recommend?

>>9360188
I actually remember when Chrichton died.

I was glad because I was so sick of the shit he produced.
>What if science.....but then it goes cRaZy!

>>9361470
Careful with that edge.

>>9361486
Careful with that pleb taste.

>>9361463

You could say he writes pulp but he tries to make it serious, his dialogue can be a little robotic sometimes but he is very creative with his concepts.

He usually recycles the idea of science going wrong and uses author avatars like Malcolm to explain it.

He tends to use scientific jargon.

>>9361463

This >>9362097

Also you should start with easy stuff like Jurassic Park, Westworld and Congo, then go deep into more obscure stuff

>>9360188
The book version of Lex was one of the most annoying characters in fiction

>Let's make a brat, who learns nothing, who contributes nothing, who only exists to create dangerous situations

Just have Grant and Tim bond