is this the endgame of philosophy?

the fact that you have managed to ask a question about those books suggests not, doesn't it?

>>9347268

Not really. Considering that the unknown, the what's ahead, the future, what could possibly exist and be built afterwards, pose the greatest questions of all. Even if the answer is no.

>>9347274
endgame of philosophy suggests to me that it's more or less done and there are no more moves to be made in the language game because someone has found a checkmate argument

is that what you mean?

Glad my On Certainty posting has caught on.

Carry the torch, brother.

>>9347280
On Certainty is just entry level pleb pyrrhonism

>>9347287
>On Certainty is just entry level pleb pyrrhonism

You didn't get it.

Nobody else on /lit/ has read George Berkeley