Is it feasible to study philosophy starting with Wittgenstein?

File: 1491149690882.png (187KB, 291x293px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 291x293px

Yes, go on. You'll surely succeed.

>>9342854
>Is it feasible to study mathematics starting with algebraic topology?

>>9342854
Wittgenstein is really not that difficult

Read the Tractatus and if it confuses you just read the later work where he offers a competing theory of language to the one put forward in the TLP. The TLP is a pretty short book. The rest of his stuff is (supposedly) written to educate children, to some degree.

It's a pretty simple book, you gotta understand formal logic notation though.

>>9342854
Yes but start with PI and then go back to the Tractatus

File: mm4JFJT.png (421KB, 502x369px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 502x369px

>>9342854
>Is it feasible to study a piece of philosophy that has never been fully understood by anybody ever

I don't know... Maybe.

>>9343023
>he offers a competing theory of language
Plebterpretation.

>>9342854
You can skip TL-P. Wittgenstein himself later realized how utterly stupid it was and based on a one easily debunked presumption he didn't himself address at all.

>>9344116

Which was?

>>9344118
everything in the world must be made of unique facts.