>Persons main criticism of a book is that the main character

>>9339817
I don't get this either, what's wrong with it?
>inb4 mary sue
These two things are completely different

File: 1479087165736.jpg (27KB, 639x475px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 639x475px

>>9339817

>someone complains the dialogue isn't realistic
>some complains the characters are unlikable
>someone complains the author was a terrible person and says nothing about the actual book

File: image.png (8KB, 509x619px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 509x619px

>Frozen served a political purpose: to demonstrate that a woman did not need a man to be successful. Anything written to serve a political purpose (rather than to explore and create) is propaganda, not art.
>Frozen was propaganda, pure and simple. Beauty and the Beast (the animated version) was not.

>it's another "Jordan Peterson is a fucking retard" episode

File: 1394308438548.jpg (20KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 350x350px

>>9339817
>woman criticizes book or film
>"None of the characters were likable. There was not a single one that I would go and have a cup of coffee with! Therefor the book/ film is bad."

>>9339863

Hey, males do this too, but only normie males.

File: 853.png (240KB, 325x533px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 325x533px

>>9339817
>portrayal of sexist action means the author/book is misogynistic

>>9339817
How is that even a criticism? Do they say that after reading Proust?

File: image.jpg (31KB, 379x364px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 379x364px

>>9339881
>portrayal of minorities and progressive thoughts means that the author is a fucking SJW

File: 1483333330299.jpg (173KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1500x1500px

>>9339881
>Character is a racist
>That means the author is a racist

aka "I slept through high school English"

>>9339856
What do the creators of Frozen have to gain from spreading that kind of idea?

>>9339897
It's obviously a postmodernist neomarxist conspiracy, bucko! Propaganda, nothing more!

>>9339897
Money. It is Disney, after all.

>tfw Elsa was actually supposed to be the antagonist
>tfw they made Hans a villain an hour into the movie

>>9339892
It does, tho.
Not necessarily, but its very very likely.
...learn what SJW means.

>>9339870
It's good there are few of them left.

>>9339919
It's a buzzword that dumb people use to identify anyone who has any opinion left of the status quo. It immediatly ends debates and put you in the same group that incoudes that the screaming red-haired feminist and the other one who got mad at hugh mungus.
It's like calling a conservative "nazi", or calling a socialist "stalinist". It's pure semantic,mloaded with malice.

>>9339943
Social Justice Warriors is what they used to call themselves, you know.

>a person who expresses or promotes socially progressive views.

>>9339943
Nope. You have no idea, as expected.

>>9339943
>It's like calling a conservative "nazi"

Like liberals did with Bush, Mccain and Romney? Now they're crying wolf again about Trump being the uber creme de le cream of nazis?

Lefties are really fucking annoying

>>9339983
>Social Justice Warriors is what they used to call themselves, you know.
Sure, in the 19th century. Nowadays is an insult.

>>9339999
>Like liberals did with Bush, Mccain and Romney?
I'm not a liberal, nor I have ever called Bush, McCain and Romney nazis, nor I ever supported those statements.

>Now they're crying wolf again about Trump being the uber creme de le cream of nazis?
no, I'm not, I was just discussing about the word SJW with another anon.

>>9339994
Is this what you would call "argument"?

>>9340014
>nor I ever supported those statements
You implicitly do, Anon.

>>9339817
I think it's only a criticism if the author is a shit character. Like Ayn Rand's stuff.

>>9340049
>this is your brain on paranoid schizophrenia