going away

This whole post makes me laugh.

>>9339334
it sounds like the perfect time to read the bible and other catholic works in your backlog.

>>9339334
>Easter
>The book needs to be long (1000 or more)

HMMMM I WONDER...

File: WARHOLIC.jpg (19KB, 220x313px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 220x313px

satire written in a mixture of forms. the essay parts are good and thought provoking.

>>9339339
>>9339343
>>9339338

I went to catholic school, and to put it nicely, it wasn't my thing.

>>9339356
>implying Catholic school and the Bible genuinely have anything to do with each other

>>9339380
Oh, actually Karamazov would work very well I think

>>9339380
What are you talking about? We had to study it several times a week...

>>9339385
Thats actually a great suggestion, been wanting to read dostojevskij for a long time. I've heard that its translations are all bad though.

>>9339389

I apologize, I was being snide; I was thinking about the legalism that can often have an oversized place in Catholicism and that can crowd out God's mercy, the real (dare I say) message of the Bible. My sincere suggestion, given the day and >>9339356, is >>9339385.

>>9339410

Assuming an English translation, I've read MacAndrew, McDuff, and Matlaw's revision of Garnett, and all three of them are good I would say. Another translation I am very intrigued by personally, and the next one I will read, is Avsey (who focused on Dostoyevsky exclusively in his translation work). (I am critical of Pevear and Volokhonsky for Dostoyevsky and so wouldn't recommend them.)

>>9339334
Thus Spoke Zarathustra.
Read it thrice

File: gTime.png (305KB, 704x460px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 704x460px

>>9339334
G-Time Johnny is woke af

>>9339437
Yeah, long time fan here. Found his vids before he went full schizo.
>>9339415
>>9339380
>>9339385
>>9339425
Thanks. Btw, that seems to only happen in america tbqh. I was sent to private school in Norway, a country with very few catholics, and consequently very few schools.
>>9339433
thanks for the suggestion

>>9339481
He's not schizo anon, he has wisdom but cannot articulate it in a way that wouldn't make normalfags go "lol he crazy"

>>9339503
I sort of agree with you, but he's clearly to some degree lost his mind. Just look at his older videos. There he spoke of the same ideas, just more coherently. To me it seems like he's overdosed on truth, just like tons of other people have.

Alex jones is a perfect example. He started out being reasonable (though on the wacky side), but he overdosed/dug too deep, and now he is a total schizo.