Top 5 books?

>>9338119
Of the Bible, I mean

File: 1451352222960.jpg (9KB, 165x231px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 165x231px

>>9338120

I've only read the 1st five so far so

1. Genesis
2. Exodus

3. Deuteronomy

4. Numbers

5. DUE TABERNACLE LMAO

>>9338119
God isn't real.

>believing a 2000 year old book written by kikes

lmfao you can make this shit up

God isn't real.

There is no logical or rational position in believing in a sky fairy.

Leap of faith is willingly admitting you are retarded enough to forego all critical thought because a book with old words said god made the earth in 7 days, lmfao.

lmfao

>>9338286
Nobody reads The Odyssey because they worship a Cyclops you fucking muppet.

>>9338286
God is very much real and acts even today.

Ghosts are real, too.

>>9338304
false equivalence fallacy

>>9338316
evidence is required for such a claim

File: costanza-20[1].jpg (8KB, 276x277px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 276x277px

>>9338286
>believing in a sky fairy
Muh sky fairy muh sky fairy!

Implying that the Christian conception of God is not
>That God is not an object or substance alongside other objects or substances in the world; rather, He is pure being or existence itself, utterly distinct from the world of time, space, and things, underlying and maintaining them in being at every moment, and apart from whose ongoing conserving action they would be instantly annihilated. The world is not an independent object in the sense of something that might carry on if God were to “go away”; it is more like the music produced by a musician, which exists only when he plays and vanishes the moment he stops. None of the concepts we apply to things in the world, including to ourselves, apply to God in anything but an analogous sense. Hence, for example, we may say that God is “personal” insofar as He is not less than a person, the way an animal is less than a person. But God is not literally “a person” in the sense of being one individual thing among others who reasons, chooses, has moral obligations, etc. Such concepts make no sense when literally applied to God

But im sure you were meming anyway, making this post redundant.

>>9338352
>pantheistic drivel

oh look another post with not a shred of evidence

>>9338358
>Shouts 'pantheistic drivel'
>Not realizing that pure actuality necessarily entails a monotheistic God
>Not realizing that given what he probably believes about causality he has to believe in pure actuality and hence God too.

Top jej

Are there some good accompanying guides to the old testament you guys could recommend? the fucking thing has like 5000 unique characters and way too much filler/rambling.

>>9338367
>Not realizing that pure actuality necessarily entails a monotheistic God
where's the demonstrable evidence for that?
>Not realizing that given what he probably believes about causality he has to believe in pure actuality and hence God too.
where's the demonstrable evidence for that?

File: 1300044776986.jpg (17KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 250x250px

>>9338378
>Asks for 'evidence'
>Implying that the epistemology of scientism is useful for all investigation into the universe and reality
>Implying that metaphysical demonstration from eminently knowable facts is insufficient even though the epistemology of scientism makes myriad metaphysical and philosophical assumptions to even function
>Implying that this will be a fruitful conversation
>Implying that people ever really change their minds
>Implying that you wont greentext quote the above and say that you do because you're such a 'rational' and 'logical' person
I dont hate you

>>9338404
faith and assumption with charlatan causation theories with no demonstratable proof is not evidence

>>9338286
God is as real as gaytheist meme posters