perceptivity + vigorous exertion for thousands of hours = mastery

>>9337361
What is 'perceptivity'? Maybe with the Sistine Chapel as an example.

It's either simple or easy or neither.

You know, these kind of questions start a query in my mind. Every time. Query on the rest of the big questions, regarding existence, its nature and such. I get stunned by my ignorance.
You need endurance and character, a goal to align your perception with, challenges and guidelines.

Is this what it is like to slip into madness? Then again, what would that mean? That I steal the order from my world?

>>9337361
It really is that simple. And if you want to be truly perceptive, don't get caught in the trap of believing you are right about anything, to the exclusion of all new information. Always challenge yourself and be open to change.

You need a higher functioning brain to write masterpieces. If you were meant to create, most of it would come easily, more naturally than it does to other people. At bottom, we can't ignore that talent exists. It's all in the mind, brother.

>>9337361
>Faulkner wrote As I lay Dying from midnight to 4 am in 6 weeks not changing a word.
>This work greatly contributed in him winning Nobel in Literature

I agree with you but it doesnt apply that greatly to literature.