What news sources does /lit/ read or follow?

>>9335298
Infowars, The Young Turks, Buzzfeed, Daily Mail and Huffington Post mostly.

the conversation, schwartz report, snopes, vice and vox.

Frogtwitter
Hyde Wars
Nick Land's blog

Guardian, Truthdig, Politico, Spiegel and lots of local, Croatian shitty ones.

>>9335298
I don't follow any. News is depressing.

>>9335298

milo yiannopoulos twitter, nick lands blog, Fox news, sargon of akad and various "sjw's rekt-accounts" on twitter

>>9335298
Fox news, jezabel and zerohedge

File: IMG_2562.jpg (132KB, 580x386px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 580x386px

One man, three blogs

>>9335298
WSJ because the rest are a joke. But the reporting can be garbage at times. Tom Wolfe's roastie daughter writes for them, actually.

>>9335298
AP & Reuters sometimes, but mostly I just try and glean what's happening in the world from conversations with people. But I never ask about any details because I want to seem like I know whats happening.

>>9335298
BBC, NPR, NYT, Washington Post, Atlantic, sometimes RT or Al Jazeera if I want more views of a topic.

this is just for national/international news stuff. I read the Kansas City Star and listen to KCUR for local stuff.

File: 1473969183365.jpg (2MB, 2700x1503px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2700x1503px

/pol/

>>9335304
Jesus, I get called a liberal all the time and I just vomited in my mouth. Those aren't news, they're low-grade editorial media.

Reuters, Frankfurter Allgemeine, Süddeutsche

>>9335582
This.

MSM is fake news, take the red pill

>>9335326
>>9335529
>>9335530
>>9335582
funny how the altrightos only read what fits their world view. also note how a lot of it is twitter, which is not a news source

>>9335737
Exact same goes for the left.

File: image.jpg (175KB, 800x1066px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 800x1066px

Can you guys recommend me some website with good quality news from all over the world (but mostly Europe and US) and rigorously based on TRUTH?

>>9335746
Also, it must be politically impartial.

>>9335746
Economist?

>>9335746
Reuters BBC etc

>>9335746
AP and Reuters.

/pol/ and the other /pol/

unironically great for international news and internationa politics

>>9335758
Must read, but not really a news source.

>>9335746
>>9335752
>>9335758
>>9335768
>>9335775

>

>>9335784
What does this post imply

File: figure it out.jpg (38KB, 700x526px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 700x526px

>>9335746
Better to first watch someone who is open about their biases and learn to catch people in lies before graduating to people who try be unbiased and catching them in those lies.

All news outlets just give you the narrative, it's up to you to do the groundwork to find out what's identifiably true and what's not, and make useful judgments on the rest.

I'll say it again: news outlets aren't authorities, they're platforms. Even if you find one that has never lied to your knowledge and gives you timely and incredibly useful information, don't shut off your brain and don't elevate it/them into something infallible.

This need for vigilance, incisive intellect, and an autistic focus on things actually being true before taking them as true is why most people can and always will be easily led three ways from Sunday by various arms of the media. People are lazy, integrity is hard.

>>9335825
A big surge of horseshit. I asked because I don't have the time to read 27 newspapers from different countries only to understand what is the most impartial and objective. I asked because I trust the opinion of most people on here.

>>9335859
Just read Alex Jones and Huffington Post for the full picture

>>9335859
I didn't ask you to read 27 newspapers. I'm telling you that learning to swim is better then memorizing a currently dry path in a crisscrossing web of ocean sandbars in a landscape that is forever changing.

>>9335868
Good post if sarcastic. Scary if serious.

Sometimes I look at the news section of wikipeida

>>9335553
>Kansas City Star
I am truly sorry for your lots.

>>9335816
Death of the author.

>>9335887
Fuck off. The whole point of asking for good quality news sources is that it then doesn't matter if I have good judgement or verification of what ever. I just stick to quality sources and I'll have the truth.

>>9335999
This faggot is trying to steal my identity (>>9335746). Childish.

>>9336015
I came here to see what news sources people have posted. Why can't I tell someone to fuck off and explain why I disagree? Just because you talked to them before I did?

So, to be clear to >>9335887, I am not >>9335746. I just disagree with what you said and explained my position. Hope that clears up any hurt feelings or identity discomfort.

File: of yore.jpg (62KB, 734x510px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 734x510px

>>9336015
>he's implicitly stealing my identity on an anonymous board!
lol

>>9336015
These other guys are giving you a hard time, but I'm legitimately curious. With the additional perspective of time, do you think that >>9336015 was a bit of an overreaction, and that calling someone childish on that basis was unnecessary? If not, how is it justified?

>>9335356
this, and there's no reason to other than to be able to socialize about shit with other people who waste their time watching the news, your life is not ever going to change by knowing one more awful after thing another that's happening, I'm already well aware of our condition and have zero need to be constantly reminded.

File: media.png (47KB, 224x903px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 224x903px

I use a news aggregation, and sometimes I just want to read about certain subjects in the last few months.

>>9336278
Also, Vice News and Vanity fair I use almost exclusively for celebrity garbage

>>9335298
Russia Today, and 4chan

>>9335298
>people read more than the headlines before digging deeper themselves or talking to people
What the actual fuck?

Guardian
FT
Economist
BBC

>>9336250
I'm always rather ironic when I post on this website. I often laugh at my own posts.

>>9335746
The Intercept, truthdig, democracy now!

>>9335298
CNN (for hourly horse race bullshit, most of it is bad)
The Intercept (foreign affairs)
Jacobin (good long-form articles)

>>9335737
Funny how you can't detect irony in a website culture infested with meta-meta-metairony.

The Economist
New Yorker
Politico
Axios
WSJ
Financial Times
HBJ

/pol/
CNN
RT
Infowars
Colbert Report
Forbes
Hacker News

>>9336719
And Business Insider

File: ricky.png (148KB, 222x293px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 222x293px

>>9335529
>arious "sjw's rekt-accounts" on twitter

I mostly find out what happened by talking to people. Sometimes from 4chan.

File: 1490105988915.png (224KB, 700x949px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 700x949px

I've tried to set up RSS readers/news aggregators many times, and I've always regretted it. There's just too much fucking shit that clogs up the feed - headlines that deliberately try to generate a reaction and get you to click. Even limiting the sources to a select few doesn't help, because even the most esteemed sources will have a good fraction of clickbait-y articles.

Take pic related as an example. "Why girl, 2, had to defend her choice of doll." This is an example of complete trash that I don't want in my feed. Why in the fuck would I ever give a shit about this random child and her fucking doll? "This vault seeks to protect world's most precious data." Fuck off. Which vault? I'm not going to click you shitty story to find out. If this vault were so substantial and important, they wouldn't so vague about it in the headline. Why would I waste my life away reading about random shit that won't have a substantial impact on the world?

Now I'm not sure why I care so much. I don't understand how anybody can spend so much time reading the news. Most of it is mediocre writing and wishy-washy analyses. All the time taken to read articles, compare sources, and come up with my own conclusions I'd rather spend on reading more substantial books and learning deeper truths about the world.

File: ha.jpg (68KB, 640x460px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 640x460px

>>9336278
>marxist shitheel who reads NYT Jacobin and new yorker
>plays video games and reads video game reviews and discusses video games online like a fucking manchild
every time

>>9335746
did you post that image knowing it was an Aldo Rossi building?

>>9336845
>neoliberals are marxists
>social democrats are marxists
>people who publish shitty sentimental bourgeois stories about middle aged women with family issues are marxists
Lower taxes a smidgen and you're Hitler.

National Review
Spectator
American Spectator
New Yorker
New Statesman
RT
CGTN

File: 1487354017327m.jpg (99KB, 1024x570px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1024x570px

Breitbart

>>9337164
Neoliberal doesn't mean what you think it means.

>>9337269

I hate this dork so much.

>>9335298
/pol/

>>9335980
>>9335980
>I am truly sorry for your lots.

Eh? The Star has had a lot of lay offs if that's what you're talking about (myself included). But KC is a cool place.

al jazeera
bbc
reuters
rt
/pol/
hacker news
various neoreactionaries on twitter

>>9337306
Who even is he?

helsingin sanomat
yle
al jazeera
bbc
guardian

Any huezilians in here? Can you tell me if ig.com has some serious dirt behind it? It's what I read to get the news of the day, it just seems to have a slight neoliberal bias.

>>9337525
Like every other big media outlet over here, the neoliberal bias is the norm, see VEJA, O Estado de São Paulo, ISTOÉ, G1 or even Carta Capital and any other newspaper/news network. I, being from SC, get my local news from the ClickRBS/A Notícia combo and my international news from Le Monde, Der Spiegel, The Economist and Reuters, the NYT once in a while.

You just have to waddle trough the shitty "let's suck America's cock and open our asses to globalization and idolize the """free markets""" worldwide" narrative BR media pushes and you're set.

Also avoid Jornal Nacional and GloboNews like the plague.

Vox, Verge, Guardian, Politico, BBC, NPR, Inter Press Service, Al Jazeera,

>>9335737
>taking these goys seriously