how is new philosopher magazine?

looks like a circlejerk for STEMautists, economists and posthumanists

>>9328823
Buzzfeed but more postmodern circlejerk

>>9328834

STEMautists would not want to be seen anywhere near anyone who would even consider having a peek at the contents of THAT garbage. Please.

>>9328870
STEM isn't just physics and math, there are also compsci and other soft science courses

>>9328916

Yes, I know, I study CS, and that's exactly why I feel so much contempt well up within me at the mere sight of that cover. It's buzzwords galore, made by and for retards.

>>9328919
Why did you choose to be a computer technician instead of a scientist

>>9328927

Because I enjoy using said science for something concrete and am not a parasite?

>>9328930
Huh? What science are you using exactly?

>>9328939

Computer science, duh?

>>9328955
kek

>>9328972

Let me guess, you dropped out of chemistry or some other field with a female majority?

>>9328975
No, still doing physics
Just curious what you consider "science"

>>9328985

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_science

I suppose they must have lowered the admission requirements for physics at whatever local community college you're attending.

>>9328989
So insecure you can't take bants and link to wiki instead of speaking from experience? Man, CS really is a lower caste

Yeah, you do have autism.

I'm glad we didn't get merged with /sci/. The levels of pedantry and autistic shit flinging would be off the charts.

>>9328823
The essay comps are vaguely interesting. It's been going for ages in Australia, came to Europe I think about a year and a half ago iirc. It's not massively brilliant but alright.

>>9328823
Not as good as Collapse

>>9328823
imagine pomo 21st century philosophy if it were a magazine

>>9328823
mediocre, although I'm basing this opinion off the one issue I read.

Also its graphic design aesthetic is disgusting to me.

>>9328834
>>9328870
>>9328916
>>9328919
>>9328927
>>9328930
>>9328939
>>9328955
>>9328972
>>9328975
>>9328985
>>9328989
>>9329000
Cringed

>'philosophy' magazines

Has /lit/ sunk this low?

>>9328823
It's pretty good. A compendium of essays and topics, they tend to have some very good book recommendations. Don't read into what people in this thread are saying, they're contrarians for the sake of boredom and try to ruin everything.

Coffee doesn't need to be shilled more than it already is

File: IMG_20170328_143812_661.jpg (28KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 320x320px

I buy it to read on the dunny since im paranoid about reading a book or my phone on there. The essays are interesting, the covers are always buzzword nonsense. I like the design. Oh and theres no advertisements in the magazine unlike with most others, so you dont get full page spreads advertising watches or whatever.
I thinks its good conversation fuel for talking to normies, i can never normally think of a topic that they wont hit snooze on, and isnt a current meme, so i bring up something i read while forcing out a shit and my opinion on it, leaving them thinking i am an interesting person.

File: 37824723.jpg (80KB, 500x716px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 500x716px

kid