Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: IMG_2689.jpg (68KB, 800x522px) Image search:
[Google]
68KB, 800x522px
1. He was a cuck. Themes of anti nationalism and pretty language that he probably looked up in a thesaurus to seem deep is absolute nu male bait.
2. He's pretentious. His language makes no sense. Yet people will still look down on scifi or fantasy as jokes, when they are more readable and have better plots than Shakespeare. I can already imagine the libtards who quote that when writing their cultural marxist English BA final paper about seeing their wives get fucked by BBC.
3. The plots suck. I think this one explains itself.
4. He's feminine. Who the fuck wants to read books about pretty boys? Again, bluepilled bait. No wonder (((they))) have kids read him in high school.
Have fun playing with an old fashioned medium to prove how le smart you are for tumblrina reblogs while I go have actual fun playing games.
>>
LOTR is better and has a cooler plot than any Shakespeare work
>>
gr8 b8 m8
>>
File: IMG_2641.jpg (27KB, 300x250px) Image search:
[Google]
27KB, 300x250px
>>9320775
triggered?
>>
File: Vape Wedding.jpg (30KB, 544x414px) Image search:
[Google]
30KB, 544x414px
>>9320767
He hadst small Latin and less Greek
>>
>>9320760
Shakespeare is overrated, but not for the reasons you give. It's more that he shamelessly sucked the cock of the power structure, and was obsessed with stuffing sex jokes into everything.
Hamlet really is great, though. But yeah, I don't think he's the greatest writer of all time or anything like that.
>>
>>9320782
> He hadst
And you have even less English.
>>
>>9320760
only cucks say cuck
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3