>>9307980
As long as it's sound and coherent, not at all.
nietzsche built a career on it
>>9308014
Go on...
>>9308021
the eternal recurrence was not a novel idea
Some call it 'thinking for yourself'
Crazy folk
>>9308057
So when you take up another philosopher's idea as you intend to mix it with another's, should this be a synthesis of both? Or is it alright to use them both as components of a whole?