if a bisexual writer doesnt write about lgbt characters does that still mean they're a lgbt author? just wondering for submitting manuscripts for places that call for "lgbt" authors, im unsure if they mean the author theirself, or the content of their work.
Bi isn't even much of an orientation. It just means you're a decadent perv
>People of colour.
>Black people.
>Coons.
>Niggers.
Bisexual here
I'd gladly read a book by a gay or lesbian or bisexual or whatever
You couldn't pay me to read a book by an "LGBT author"
It is whatever faggots want it to be
Slap a label on it and deranged faggots will buy it
>>9284375
No. If they're asking for LGBT it means they want to hear about your daily struggle to take dick in the ass while dodging the hillbilly biblethumping death squads of Drumpftler's AmeriKKKa. You can submit, and they can't outright drop you because you could counter with muh oppression, but they will (ironically) "soft oppress" you and make sure your name is never at the top of the list.
If they didn't care about where your writing was on the spectrum (the gay one) they wouldn't specify.
let's have this thread again
>>9284375
I have not had sex with a man in 3 years. I have not had sexual thoughts about a man in maybe 5 hours. I have not had sex with a woman in 3 months. I have not had sexual thoughts about woman in maybe 5 hours.
I am currently asexual and devoid of sexual desires and actions. I expect to be devoid of sexual interactions with another subject for days, weeks, months, who knows. I expect I will have sexual desires about men or women sometime later today.
I have not eaten meat in about 4 minutes, I have been a vegetarian for 4 minutes. But I plan on finishing my sandwich after I post this comment.
Am I currently a vegetarian? Even if I intend to eat salami in mere seconds?
Am I gay when I am not engaging in gay interactions or gay fantasies?
Sometime about stepping into the same river twice.
what if a bisexual writer writes about George W Bush
>>9286456
>Am I gay
"yes"
>>9284386
>property
>>9284375
>there are articles written about this shit
http://nymag.com/selectall/2017/02/whomst-is-the-smartest-on-4chan.html
>>9287228
>the author unironically thinks tfw to smart posters are being serious
>tfw to smart too take 4chan seriously.
>>9284386
>not pavement apes