If every philosopher had to give a minimum of fifty convincing

>>9262281
Provide fifty convincing heterogenous examples for this claim.

>>9262289
I'm not a philosopher I'm a scientist.

>>9262307
>There never was any disagreement in the history of science

>heterogenous examples pertaining to the real world

Go back to /sci/. Philosophical thought isn't necessarily constrained to scientific tools or methodology, nor should it be. Why would you want to girdle the wind to a plow?

>>9263024
>Philosophical thought isn't necessarily constrained to scientific tools or methodology

In other words "I experienced something lets generalize this to the whole world"

File: peter griffin.jpg (240KB, 2855x1604px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 2855x1604px

Disagreement isn't a bad thing in philosophy, since unlike science it doesn't annihilate the losing argument. They just kind of co exist, and all anyone really does is read every statement ver batim, nod the head, and say, ah yes, that reminds me of the time Descartes...

>>9263045
What do you think the point of philosophy is, what purpose does it have?

>>9262281
>implying ontology is objective