What books printed in the last fifty years or so, will still be in print in another 50 years?
Let's predict future classics
probably those emoji Shakespeare adaptations
Kazuo Ishiguro's 'Never Let Me Go'. An achievement.
>>9256092
Please no
Harry Potter, John Green's books, my diary and that female poet you lot like
>>9256064
Hey, do those editions actually exist? I think they're beautiful
>>9256114
I'm not OP. Yes, they do exist. And they actually happen to be one of the worst selling lines of classic reprints to date. Why? Because buyers don't want cloth-bound hardbacks. There's a perishability in cloth that is at odds with the idea of a hardback.
>>9256129
Well, I like cloth-bound hardbacks, so give em to me. Seriously, anyone wanna send me his beautiful Penguin classics by post?
>>9256064
Infinite Jest
>>9256064
Everything by Calvino
>>9256299
or Bolaño. Or Saramago.
But those are easy picks.
>>9256137
The designs are of such low quality that they'll be scatched off before you take the books home. Do not buy, my friend
>>9256307
Same with McCarthy.
>>9256137
Those hardbacks are travesty for not including the traditional designs. They look cringeworthy AF.
Life of Pi imo
Infinite Jest as well
people will say "well its not amazing but its a very good representation of [some post-internet 21st century yuppie bullshit]"
le zeitgeist mém
fifty shades of grey
>>9257036
this post implies you actually read that shit
cringe
>>9256967
>Life of Pi imo
The first half is quite decent even if the prose is a bit obnoxious, and the message is plain stupid. The second part were he eats tiger shit and punches a shark, or that stupid carnivore island is quite retarded. I don't think it's 100% shit, but it's pretty poor.
>>9258475
What was the point of the book except for Pi realizing that tigers actually eat people?
>>9256209
The popomos in general tbqh. Unfortunately.
IJ will be either seen like Hunger or like Ulysses for popomo. Probably the former.
>>9256299
If on a winter's night a traveler is so comfy
>>9256064
It's going to be the Harry Potter equivalent or some complete obscurity nobody hasn't even heard about yet.
Listened to a podcast(don't remember what and cant find it) where somebody argued this is what history tells about the predictions like these.
>>9256114
kys
>>9256064
>still be in print
>in the age of digital books
nothing is ever going to go "out of print" again functionally even if they literally go out of print
but anyway, future classics:
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (1971)
Gravity's Rainbow (1973)
Xala (1973)
The Autumn of the Patriarch (1975)
Ceremony (1977)
Midnight's Children (1981)
Love in the Time of Cholera (1985)
Blood Meridian (1985)
It (1986)
Beloved (1987)
Watchmen (1987)
Soul Mountain (1989)
The Joy Luck Club (1989)
Maus (1991)
Infinite Jest (1996)
A Game of Thrones (1996)
Blonde (2000)
White Teeth (2000)
Perdido Street Station (2000)
American Gods (2001)
The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao (2007)
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (2007)
11/22/63 (2011)
Lincoln in the Bardo (2017)
Anne Carson
Krasznahorkai
Adam Zagajewski
None. The codex will die in your lifetime
>>9256097
such a boring and terrible book
>>9258725
you're a boring and terrible book
>>9258693
>American Gods
>Stephen King
2666
The Savage Detectives
Bolaño, senpai.
McElroy, but only in 100 years
>>9256064
Carver
Wallace
McCarthy
Pynchon
DeLillo
Mario Vargas Llosa, most specifically The War of the End of the World.
>>9256299
This desu desu senpai
>>9256064
Books by the following authors:
Pynchon
Vargas Llosa
DFW
Murakami
White Teeth (only Zadie Smith book that has a chance at standing the test of time)
DeLillo
Oē
Calvino
Saramago
GGM
McCarthy
Eco
Krazsnahorkai
Bolaño (small following)
McElroy (if he sorts his publishing issues out)
I left guys like Cortázar, Kawabata, Mishima, and Borges out because most of their noteworthy stuff was published before the 50 years period.
maya anjelou and rumi kuar
>>9257036
Fuck off, tao
>>9256064
literally nothing.
I hope every single piece of (((literature))) that mentions anything electronic, modern past 1910, or relevant to our lives today gets destroyed in a massive fire.
God fucking 4th Reich when.
>>9256064
My diary desu
>>9259822
Care to expound, friend?
>>9256129
Is that why Everyman's Library sells literally one billion bookos a year?
I'm hoping published collections of tweets take off in a big way. I've got a fair bit invested in the idea.
>>9260214
>not published collections of 4chan posts
Would be ten times better desu.
>>9258500
Low quality b8 still made me rage a tiny rage in my heart. Thanks for reminding me of my pettiness.
>>9260174
Just go be Amish you Luddite faggot.
>>9260214
Mate that is over a couple of billion posts...
I swear this board and grasping numbers.
>>9256105
>Harry Potter
>classic
>my sides
How can none of you uneducated swines list that one? The Godfather is basically a Dostoevsky novel light.
>>9260554
yea, unlike his diary, rupi kaur and john green
>>9260567
I don't know those books/authors, so forgive me.
Bolaño
Chirbes
Marías
Vargas Llosa
Vila-Matas
Superior Spanish literature.
>>9256064
Milk and Honey
>>9256137
Give me your address
>>9260570
no worries, they are all /lit/ memes
>>9260570
lurk before posting
>>9258693
You are a complete and utter moron, all your reedit meme trash will be forgotten as soon as the merchandise dries up.
>>9260221
Internet culture in general eill be seen as abstract art in 70-80 years.
I hope to god some shit like this really does happen not like modern art coming out today id anymore interesting after all.
house of leaves, by Mark Z Danielewski
>>9260561
This book is unadulterated garbage. Puzo has zero literary merit and will only be remembered as a footnote in the history of cinema.
Dunno why it's not talked about more
Literally Harry Potter. The first book was published 20 years ago and it still dominates popular culture. You will never hear the end of it.
>>9256064
I hate these editions
Who thought they were a good idea?