is it just a coincidence, /lit/?
>>9249576
I don't see a compelling reason to connect most of those events. I know in particular that the French Revolution was more inspired by advances in physiology and not physics through the physiocrats.
>>9249626
the political and scientific events don't have to be connected to each other, it's only insofar as they happen at the same time. Althusser's point is not that they are connected necessarily, just that whenever you get major advances in one, the other two are usually not far behind.
>>9249576
Their are major definable political events over the course of any lifetime, and science is always moving forward with new discoveries, this could be done for any philosopher as convincingly as the ones cherry picked in the picture. I mean hell the last one just says "developments in technology"
>>9249668
Yeah I don't really see any concrete causation here either.
>>9249576
>developments in technology
>>9249681
Imperialism, the locomotive, and machine guns are all hand in hand
>>9249576
Ne