Book cover

File: abwtk BW.jpg (604KB, 1600x2400px) Image search: [Google]

604KB, 1600x2400px

>>9248901

>>9248905
>>9248901
both fucking awful

Judging it by its cover, looks like it's some trash pulp-thriller.

File: 1470507497007.gif (1MB, 477x268px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 477x268px

>>9248905
>>9248901
>that title
>those covers

>>9248905
If it's satire it's perfect. If it's not, burn your manuscript.

>>9248901
definitely B > A

>>9248901
>>9248905
not gonna lie. these are pretty epic. I like hopw the guy is standing heroically in the center. looks dope. hey can you stop posting here and never come back? cool.

>>9248901
I like the first but the typography is awful, the second is probably on the spot.

>>9248901
BLAINE?

>>9248901
>Jason Blaine

I'm assuming if this was real it would be satire so cover one is more obnoxious and better

>>9248901
They both look suitably pulpy (and congrats finishing a novel.)

I think A is better. The guy in B doesn't look grizzled enough, although there is something satisfyingly John Woo in the font and title and so on.

>>9248901
you could have gone by Dick Bush. Why didn't you?