Is it the touch we feel, or the fact that we touched?

>>9234681
Dude weed lmao

>>9234681
What if you touch your finger with another finger
What then?

>>9234685
Not now chief, I'm in the zone

>>9234693
I don't concern myself with self-touching

>>9234681
>the fact that we touched

is what we wind up writing about, ultimately, the former proposition, though more real-seeming, is actually the phantom.. There's also the more plausible notion (AS a notion) that we may touch, in the future.,

you feel both. the contact. and it also depends on who has the active part

but writing is itself recollection; therefore, the fact prevails over the experience, which occured before the writing began. One may of course predict the future and see if the facts line up-- when and if they do. When reading one experieces 'reading' and that is all. To write about this experience is to recollect it, not 'to have it' all over again.

>>9234681
Base your rethorical question on Newtons laws and the answer will come right at you; action leads to opposite reaction. Therefore a finger that touches a surface is also getting "touched" by the surface.