Well /lit/, is it true?
>>9227059
Only man vs. author really fits into postmodern alone. I mean, Man vs Self isn't a modern-only convention, that's always been present in literature.
eh, its not completely true but I also completely see where the artist is coming from
>>9227065
I think the problem with defining postmodernism is that strict definitions go against the major tenants of postmodernism.
Only if you speak in generalities.
>>9227079
only a sith deals in absolutes
>>9227079
More like in banalities
>>9227078
That would only be difficult if you subscribe to postmodernist perspective then.
>>9227078
I just realized something
postmodernism is so fucking dumb
>>9227145
Nah just frustrating and an artistic dead end desu
man vs technology is such a bad meme
>>9227152
all art is a dead end desu
>>9227059
why does it always have to be man vs something?
why not nature vs god? that'd be pretty cool right?
or how about god vs reality or hell reality vs reality?
are authors too close-minded?
>>9227165
that's pure nonsense desu
>>9227182
>why does it always have to be man vs something?
>why not nature vs nature?
damn... that would be fucking cool indeed bruh
>>9227252
>being this new
>>9227079
>This internet joke isn't accurate enough while talking about several centuries of literature.
>>9227264
i wish
>>9227059
What does "man vs reality" even means?
>>9227640
I think it's basically books where people question the nature of reality or reality breaks down. An obvious example is the matrix. A subset of this man vs reality is media with time travel or parallel universes.
>>9227618
kek what books should i read for the fourth column feel?
>>9228344
I haven't finished writing it yet.
>>9228344
baudrillard, harry potter
>>9227307
What was the fucking punchline.
how is man vs. technology not the same as man vs. man
>>9228471
unless it's like terminator i'd call man vs tech a specific case of man vs society
>>9228366
That the cat has John's pipe
>>9227182
how about batman vs superman, that would be rlly cool
>>9228727
no it's man v. self