How many of these /lit/-core books have you read?

File: 1477475495700.jpg (3MB, 1820x4352px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1820x4352px

Wrong chart, dickhead.

you can be assured some of these were posted only by those looking for a pat on the back

>>9210928
26, plus a few I started and never finished.

>>9210951
31

>>9210951

25, a solid quarter
What is the minimum for not being retarded?

>>9210951

10 from this list so far, working through Anna Karenina and some non-fiction on the side right now though.

>>9210951
I just started reading The Crying of Lot 49. I don't understand what the fuck is going on. What's more, English is not my mother language. What am I missing here?

>>9210928
>23
but I don't like the list

>>9210928
27

>>9211177
It's plot is relatively coherent, though fairly convoluted. If you're near the start and confused you may be at the part where Oedipa starts imagining herself as Repunzel, that's in her head. Just enjoy the ride

>>9211177
Its shit.

>>9210951
10

>pleb status confirmed

>>9210928
21 on this chart. but i agree with the others, its not a very good chart. ive read harry potter and hitchhiker's guide but those are definitely not /lit/ books

>>9211177
I had the same problem with gravity's rainbow, didn't understand a thing desu

>>9210951
61.

>>9210928
41 and Swann's Way.

How about you?