Chart thread

File: Romans.jpg (2MB, 4800x3834px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4800x3834px

Someone post the Greek one

>>9210453
Side step this whole thread: http://4chanlit.wikia.com/wiki/Charts


Also, does anyone have 'Continuing with the Christians'? Or anything else that moves after the Romans?

>>9210619
You mean the entirety between Romans and modern?

File: 1487269698696.png (4MB, 2248x3442px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2248x3442px

>>9210682

>>9210685
>considering that you are probably right-wing

What kind of garbage biased chart is this?

>>9210676
I mean like a post-Classical chart, like Patristics, Low Middle Ages, up to the Islamic Golden age. Some pre-Renaissance

>>9210682
A liberal or socialist would recommend the exact same books.

>>9210709
>What kind of garbage biased chart is this?

That chart is for a predominately right wing board.

File: 1383014676779.jpg (2MB, 4000x3549px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4000x3549px

Is this a meme chart? Why is Confessions of a Mask fascist?

>>9210937
I despise political people so much

>>9210745
That simply is not true.

Has anyone read through a full chart before? Was it worth it for you and your interest in the topic?

File: 190px-Yang_in_Iserlohn_799_UC.jpg (10KB, 190x143px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 190x143px

>>9210745
>>9210995

I hate to debunk your argument, since I think they are great texts irrespective of political leaning - but yeah, I would recommend these books and I am a raging libtard.

I can, in fact, recommend another book that's not listed - Sorel's "On Violence", which deals with the transition of socialism to fascism in the 1920's and the basis of the collective anitrationalist myth.

>>9210937
Because Fascist is not an inherently derogatory term, Bigot.

>>9210968
why

>>9211113
There's nothing fascist about Confessions of a Mask unless you're implying fascists are gays in denial

>>9210744
https://docs.google.com/document/u/0/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/pub

>>9211134
Because literally everything they do it about their political party or stance. Instead of just making a nice chart about a topic, it has to be "LE POL CHART ON LE REDPILL BOOKS"

>>9211169
>redpill me on pol influence in the charts

>>9211169

A key advantage of reading some of the older books on political theory are precisely that they offer you a different view into how the discourse could be. Great example is actually found in presidential speeches - Lincolns were actually intended to communicate specific policies and rationally advocate for them. Nowadays, so much of what we see is rhetorical bandwagoning for the mass media.

File: Akari 20.jpg (397KB, 1486x1035px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 1486x1035px

>>9211169
Why do books make you angry?

File: 1466948836086.jpg (1MB, 3672x3024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3672x3024px

>>9210581

>>9210968
>>9211169
Looks like you took the bluepill as a suppository.

File: 1488584244888.jpg (45KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 640x480px

>>9211179
>Nowadays, so much of what we see is rhetorical bandwagoning for the mass media.

From every side to be fair. The entire political game is now basically the X-Factor with middle aged rich people.

>>9212193

Butters?

>>9210682
>>9210685
the order of reading in these charts is very bad

>>9211169
anyone not living innawoods is a "political person"

>>9212479
Actual the vast majority of people aren't a political person from one election cycle to the next. They're uninformed on most issues and have no interest in properly engaging with their representatives or trying to do anything actually political. I'm sure they have some opinions on political issues but they're basically uninterested in politics because it's boring (which it often is).

Calling everybody a political person is like calling anyone who can drive a formula one racer.

>>9210654
love this one

>>9211169
>implying humans aren't innately political
I see someone didn't start with the Greeks

File: 1488585475267.png (17KB, 509x619px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 509x619px

>>9213139
> implying that calling someone a political person is meaningless

>>9210453
Someone once posted a chart of books to read about /biz/ to give you knowledge and better ideas for biz. Does anybody on here perhaps have it?

>>9211174
>redpill me on redpilling

>>9210682
>>9210685
Finally a /pol/ recommended reading list that isn't absolute trash.

>>9211188
Does a Plato chart exist?

File: IMG_1836.jpg (134KB, 750x831px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 750x831px

>>9214542

>>9215475
>spirituality
>no pseudo-dionysius
>no meister eckhart
>no cusanus

y woot m8?

>>9215516
>no naked lunch
>:(

http://imgur.com/a/l2I86

>>9212333

Is there one for Heidegger?

>>9215937
Naked Lunch is pretty obviously there. It's in the third row in the center.

>>9212333
I don't get the final joke here. Is it saying that the book is akin to cataract surgery, because you will cease to be figuratively blind after reading it, or are you saying that reading the book will cause you to require cataract surgery, because of how long and detailed it is?