Do you think every singlke philosopher of the past 200 years basically battled insecutiy issues their entire lives because they couldn't measure up to Kant?
>>9184294
thats up to you to deconstruct. kant was a tidal-wave producing splash on the scene but plenty of those that followed are at least as impressive if not more.
>>9184304
>are at least as impressive if not more.
unaware of such
peirce was p good i guess
>>9184311
Did I tell you about the time I solved philosophy? No? Well, what about the second time I solved philosophy?
>>9184294
>Linfield