Is this any good? Should I read Evola or Spengler before reading this thing?
Also /altright/ general I guess.
I recommend "Traditionalism for Dummies"
stop reading traditionalist larpers
read junger and mishima and start lifting
>>9181784
I've never heard of that. Who wrote it?
Is the title meant to be ironic? If not it sounds retardedtbh.
>>9181781
Well, why not? And considering the book is based on Evola... yeah, you should start with the basics.
Also, if the alt-right wants to build their intellectual foundations, they should be reading Alain de Benoist (e.g. "The problem with democracy," "on being a pagan")
>>9181795
I do lift (arnold blueprint). I've heard of Mishima but not Junger. Best books from those two?
>>9181797
>>9181801
>Alain de Benoist
I've never read him but I have seen /pol/ and Richard Spencer discuss him before.
>>9181814
What do you suppose this fellow meant by this .gif of a man drinking something out of a glass?
>>9181810
start with storm of steel, glass bees, sailor who fell from grace with the sea, temple of the golden pavilion
>>9181824
Thank you, lover.
>>9181781
>altright
No
>>9181801
>alt-right
Stop using this term.